Communications Leaders Weigh In on Strategic Wins and Missed Opportunities with the Harris and Walz Interview
Kamala Harris, the newly elevated Democratic presidential nominee, and her running mate, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz, recently sat down with CNN’s Dana Bash for their first significant interview since replacing Joe Biden on the Democratic ticket. The interview, highly anticipated by both supporters and critics, garnered mixed reactions, reflecting the complexities of their sudden rise and the stakes involved.
With the nation watching closely, CommPRO reached out to the communications community for their expert opinions on the interview—whether it met expectations, delivered unexpected twists, or fell short of the mark. The insights gathered from these industry leaders have been incorporated into this analysis, offering a comprehensive view of how Harris and Walz’s media performance is being perceived by professionals in the field.
First Reactions: A Mixed, Yet Strategic Success
The initial reactions to Kamala Harris and Tim Walz’s interview with CNN’s Dana Bash have been a blend of cautious optimism and strategic praise. Across the board, communications professionals have noted the effectiveness of their presentation, though not without some reservations.
Lesley Sillaman, EVP at HAVAS Red, commended the pair for their disciplined approach, highlighting how they “efficiently and effectively continued to introduce themselves to the American public.” She noted that Harris’s focus on substantive issues like the economy and healthcare helped to build on the momentum from the Democratic National Convention while humanizing her to the voters. Sillaman observed, “There were no obvious ‘gotcha’ moments, and it was clear they understood the assignment,” emphasizing that the interview met the primary objectives without any major pitfalls.
Alan Wolk, lead analyst and co-founder of TVREV, offered a broader perspective on the interview’s success, arguing that Harris achieved exactly what she needed to. “Kamala Harris had one job in the interview: come off as someone you could see running the United States. That she did with flying colors,” Wolk stated. He pointed out that Harris and Walz presented themselves as likable and relatable—a key metric in American politics. According to Wolk, the pair’s warmth and humanity were crucial in positioning themselves as a viable alternative to their opponents. While he didn’t rate the interview as perfect, Wolk emphasized that it exceeded expectations, noting, “7/10 was way above expectations, and they certainly nailed it.”
John Goodman, Founder of Goodman PR, echoed these sentiments, acknowledging that the interview successfully introduced Harris and Walz to the broader public without any major blunders. Goodman highlighted Harris’s ability to take the high ground by not engaging with Trump’s attacks, a move he believes showcased her leadership qualities. “For many Americans who foresaw a Trump landslide over Joe Biden, it showed the country has a real choice and a real race,” Goodman remarked.
Unexpected Twists: Strategic Surprises and Subtle Missteps
While the interview between Kamala Harris, Tim Walz, and Dana Bash largely went according to plan, a few unexpected twists surfaced, revealing both strategic surprises and subtle missteps in their media approach. These moments, highlighted by communications experts, added layers of complexity to what could have been a straightforward introduction to the American public.
One of the more surprising moments, as pointed out by author Helio Fred Garcia, came when Harris discussed the state of the nation over the past decade. This discussion unexpectedly highlighted a philosophical divide that Harris skillfully navigated, yet it also exposed a potential vulnerability in how her comments could be interpreted. Garcia noted the pivotal exchange when Harris described the last decade as “contrary to the spirit of where our country really lies." Bash’s literal interpretation of this statement, which suggested a critique of the Biden administration’s recent years, was deftly handled by Harris, who clarified her broader point about leadership. Garcia observed that this moment crystallized Harris’s positioning as a leader focused on uplifting the nation, contrasting sharply with the approach of her opponents.
In addition, Alan Dunton, Managing Director of SHIFT Communications pointed out some unexpected choices in the interview’s format and timing that raised questions about the campaign’s strategy. He was particularly struck by the decision to have Governor Walz share the spotlight during Harris’s first major interview. Dunton remarked, “The addition of her running mate alongside for this interview, while not outside the norm, was a bit strange as well. She's the top of the ticket and should be able to handle anything from CNN with ease.” This choice, according to Dunton, may have diluted Harris’s presence, suggesting a more cautious approach by her team. Furthermore, Dunton highlighted the timing of the interview, which aired just before a long weekend—a strategic move that seemed designed to minimize its impact, reflecting the campaign’s careful management of Harris’s public debut.
Overall Takeaway: A Strategic Success with Room for Growth
The consensus among communications experts is that Kamala Harris and Tim Walz’s first major interview was a strategic success, achieving its primary objectives while leaving some room for growth. The interview effectively introduced the duo to the broader public, projecting competence and relatability, even as some opportunities for deeper engagement were missed.
Sillaman encapsulated the overall sentiment, stating, “Harris and Walz demonstrated a comfortable rapport and that they are skilled and experienced communicators, calm under pressure.” Sillaman highlighted how the pair avoided any major missteps, which was critical for this initial public engagement. “Perhaps most importantly, there were no obvious ‘gotcha’ moments, and it was clear they understood the assignment,” she added, emphasizing that the interview met its core goals of stability and introduction.
Dominic Calabrese, adjunct professor in Columbia's Communication Department, also shared a positive assessment, noting that both Harris and Walz came off as “thoughtful and qualified.” He particularly praised Harris for her decision to take the high ground by not engaging in Trump’s personal attacks, which he saw as a strong strategic move. “The vice president also announced that she would consider appointing a Republican to her cabinet as a sign of promoting national unity,” Calabrese observed, a move he believes could resonate with a broader audience looking for a more inclusive approach to governance.
Ekaette Kern, Co-founder and CEO of TENET Consultancy, further supported the positive takeaway by praising the poise and preparedness of both candidates. “Vice President Harris, in particular, exhibited a strong command of the room, with her non-verbal cues—like eye contact and steady posture—reinforcing her verbal messaging,” Kern noted. This level of professionalism and composure, she argued, is essential in establishing credibility and trust with the electorate.
The overall takeaway from Harris and Walz’s interview is that it was a solid performance, “Was it a 10/10? No. But they didn’t need it to be. 7/10 was way above expectations, and they certainly nailed it,” confirmed Wolk.
And the CommPRO community agrees. While not flawless, the interview did what it needed to do—introduce the candidates as capable, relatable, and ready to lead. The experts suggest that while there is room for improvement, particularly in deepening engagement and refining strategy, Harris and Walz have established a strong foundation from which to build.
Learn more about participating in our CommPRO Industry membership.
